Managed IT Support
In-house vs outsourced IT support: which is right for a UK business of up to 250 people?
In-house IT versus outsourced managed support for UK SMEs: a salary-versus-MSP cost table, the co-managed middle ground and the signs it is time to outsource.
By Dig IT SolutionsUpdated 8 September 20267 min read
Short answer
For most UK businesses under about 100 staff, outsourced managed IT support costs less than one in-house engineer's salary and on-costs, covers holidays and sickness, and brings specialist depth in security, networking and Microsoft 365 that a single hire cannot. In-house IT makes sense above that size, with heavy bespoke systems, or as a co-managed lead backed by a provider.
The choice is usually framed as control versus cost. In practice it is about coverage: who is watching your systems on a Tuesday afternoon, who answers when the one engineer is on holiday, and who knows enough about EDR, firewalls, Microsoft 365 and backup to do all four properly. This guide compares the two honestly, puts UK numbers side by side, and describes the co-managed middle ground that suits many growing firms.
The two models, briefly
In-house IT means employing one or more people whose job is your technology. They sit in your office, know your staff and your applications, and are available during their working hours.
Outsourced IT support means contracting a managed service provider (MSP) to monitor, maintain, secure and support your systems for a monthly fee, usually per user or per device. The provider's engineers work remotely most of the time and visit when needed. See what is managed IT support? for what a contract covers.
Co-managed IT is both: an internal lead backed by an external provider for monitoring, security, escalation and cover. We come back to it below.
In-house IT: strengths and limits
Strengths. Immediate physical presence. Deep familiarity with your people and your line-of-business software. Direct control over priorities. Good for businesses with bespoke or unusual systems, heavy on-site hardware, or a culture that wants IT at the desk.
Limits. One person covers one person's hours. Holidays, sickness and resignations leave gaps. Nobody can be expert in everything, and a generalist engineer will be stronger on some of security, networking, cloud, backup and telephony than others. Monitoring, EDR, email filtering and RMM tools still have to be bought and run. And the engineer needs managing, training and a career path, or they leave, taking undocumented knowledge with them.
The failure mode we see most often is the single in-house engineer who is excellent, overworked, and the only person who knows how anything works. When that person resigns, the business discovers that the network diagram, the licence logins and the reasoning behind every configuration choice were never written down, and the incoming provider spends its first month reconstructing them.
Outsourced IT support: strengths and limits
Strengths. Predictable monthly cost. A team rather than a person, so cover is built in. Specialist depth across security, Microsoft 365, networking and backup because the provider does those jobs every day for many clients. Monitoring and security tooling included in the fee. Documentation as a by-product of the service. Scales up and down with headcount without recruitment.
Limits. You are one of many clients, so responsiveness depends on the SLA in your contract rather than proximity. On-site presence has to be scoped. A provider that does not know your sector's applications will be slower on those. And a badly written contract can leave you dependent on the provider for credentials and documentation. All of these are contract questions, which is why what to look for in an IT support contract matters.
The cost comparison: salary versus managed contract
The table below compares one in-house engineer with a managed contract for a 30-person business. The salary figures are indicative of ranges commonly seen in job adverts for support engineers in Hertfordshire and outer London, not survey statistics, and you should check current adverts for your area. The managed figures use our indicative per-device rates (reviewed October 2026, confirmed in a written quote).
| Cost line | In-house: one IT support engineer | Outsourced: managed contract, 30 staff |
|---|---|---|
| Base | Salary, commonly advertised around £30,000 to £40,000 in Hertfordshire, higher in central London | 30 laptops at £17.50 = £525 per month |
| On-costs | Employer National Insurance and pension, plus holiday and sick cover, commonly adding a fifth or more to salary as a rule of thumb | 1 server at £150, 1 firewall at £25, 2 printers at £20 = £195 per month |
| Tools | RMM, EDR, email filtering, ticketing, backup software: bought and licensed separately | Included in the per-device fee |
| Training and certification | Days out of the business plus course fees | Provider's responsibility |
| Cover | None when on leave or sick | Team-based, continuous |
| Management time | Recruitment, reviews, one-to-ones | An account review a few times a year |
| **Indicative annual total** | **Roughly £40,000 to £55,000 all-in for one person, before tools** | **£720 per month, about £8,640 per year** |
Add 20 desk phones at £16.50 and the managed figure rises to about £1,050 per month, still a fraction of one salary. Even if you double the managed figure to allow for on-site visits and projects, the gap remains wide. The IT support cost calculator will run this for your own headcount, and how much IT support costs in the UK explains what moves the price.
Two caveats. First, the in-house engineer gives you hours on site that the contract does not, and if you genuinely need a body in the building every day, that has value. Second, at 100+ staff with complex systems, one engineer becomes two or three and the sums start to favour a hybrid.
Comparison on the things that matter to a director
| Factor | In-house | Outsourced managed | Co-managed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cost predictability | Fixed salary, variable tooling and project spend | Fixed monthly, projects quoted | Fixed salary plus fixed contract |
| Cover for absence | None | Built in | Built in for the external part |
| Specialist depth (security, networking, cloud) | Depends on the individual | Team of specialists | Best of both |
| On-site presence | Constant | On request, scoped | Constant, with backup |
| Response commitment | Informal | SLA by priority | SLA for escalations |
| Knowledge of your applications | Deep | Grows through onboarding | Deep |
| Documentation | Often in one person's head | Required by the model | Shared |
| Scaling with growth | Recruit | Add users to the contract | Add users, keep the lead |
| Risk if the person leaves | High | Low | Medium |
Signs it is time to outsource
If you currently rely on an informal arrangement, an over-stretched in-house person, or a break-fix engineer, these are the signals we hear most often from businesses that go on to switch.
- IT spend is unpredictable. Quiet months, then a large invoice after a failure, with no way to budget.
- Staff are distracted by IT. The office manager, or the owner, spends hours a week on printers, passwords and Wi-Fi.
- Downtime is frequent or unexplained. The same problems come back and nobody finds the root cause.
- Growth has outrun the setup. Joiners wait days for a laptop, permissions are guesswork, shared drives are chaos.
- Security is a worry. No MFA, no EDR, no email filtering, staff have never been trained, and phishing emails are getting through.
- There is no tested recovery plan. Backups exist, probably, but nobody has restored from them.
- Remote working was improvised. Home networks, personal laptops and VPNs nobody manages.
- An outsider has asked. Cyber insurance renewal, a client's supplier questionnaire, or a Cyber Essentials requirement wants evidence.
- You want to focus on the business. Technology should be something you decide about, not something you fix.
Two or more of these and the question is not whether, but how. Our outsourced IT support page describes how we take that on.
The co-managed middle ground
For businesses of roughly 50 to 200 staff, the choice is often not binary. An internal IT lead who knows the business, the applications and the people is genuinely valuable. What they lack is depth, tooling and cover.
Co-managed IT keeps that person and adds an external provider for monitoring, patching, endpoint security, backup checks, complex escalations, project capacity and holiday cover. The internal lead stops being a single point of failure and gets a team behind them. Responsibilities are written down so nothing falls between the two. See co-managed IT support.
This is also a sensible route for a business whose in-house engineer is about to retire or leave: the provider onboards while they are still there, documentation is captured properly, and the business does not have to recruit a replacement under pressure.
Which businesses benefit most from each
In-house wins for larger organisations with bespoke systems, heavy manufacturing or warehouse hardware that needs constant hands-on attention, or regulatory settings that require named internal roles.
Outsourced wins for professional services, healthcare practices, construction and plant hire, estate agents, leisure businesses and most firms of up to 250 people that run on Microsoft 365, a network, a few servers and standard applications. The Hertfordshire Golf & Country Club, for example, needed a complete network built from nothing across a 16th-century Grade II listed mansion, guest Wi-Fi with bandwidth controls and UniFi Protect cameras, none of which justifies a full-time hire. Read the case study.
Co-managed wins where there is already a capable internal person and the business is growing past what one person can carry.
What to do next
If you are weighing an in-house hire against a contract, get a real number for the contract side first. The IT support cost calculator produces an indicative monthly figure from your headcount and equipment in a couple of minutes, using the per-device rates above. Put it next to the fully loaded cost of the hire and the decision usually becomes clear.

